Il Centrino Intel debutterà a marzo

Re: ma quale solaris avete provato .net
- Scritto da: Anonimo.....
IN PRIMIS le cose che hai nominato le ha
sparate tuo padre quando ti ha generato.
ma tu lo hai provato .net prima di balzare
sulle baricate *nix, non credo e potentePrima di ????Unix esisteva da quando Bill Gates si sbucciava ancora le ginocchia e tu vieni a parlare di .net ?
sicuro se poi a te piace gestire un server
via console (cliccare e troppo naife) con
.net (ma anche con 2000) hai potenti
comandi, quindi basta con le scuse tutti su
punto net, l'SO dl futuro (*nix vms ecc..
vecchiume marcio del passato) "Transparent. It?s easy to look at a UNIX system and now what is running and why. Although its configuration files may have arcane (and sometimes too-simple) syntax, they are easy to find and change.""[Riferito a Unix] Preference for text files. Most configuration setups, log files, and so on, are plain text files with reasonably short line lengths. Although this may be marginally detrimental to performance (usually in circumstances where it doesn?t matter) it is a powerful approach because a small, familiar set of tools, adapted to working with short text lines, can be used by the administrators for most of their daily tasks. In particular, favorite tools can be used to analyze all the system?s log files and error reports.""Powerful but simple scripting languages and tools. Again, familiarity and consistency among UNIX implementations is the key. Over the years, UNIX versions have evolved a good set of single-function commands and shell scripting languages that work well for ad-hoc and automated administration"" A GUI bias. Windows 2000 server products continue to be designed with the desktop in mind. There are too many functions that are either too difficult or impossible to perform using a text-based interface."" GUI operations are essentially impossible to script. With large numbers of servers, it is impractical to use the GUI to carry out installation tasks or regular maintenance tasks.""Text-based operations are more versatile; an administrator can usually do more to a system (good and bad) than is provided by the restricted, planned methods using the GUI.""Using a GUI amounts to hiding the true system modifications from the system administrators and operators. UNIX operators like the sense of control that comes from their ability to modify system tables and configuration files more directly.""Operating a GUI through a slow network connection can be too slow to be useful. Although this is less important, it can still be a consideration when there is a need to administer or diagnose a system through a dialup connection.""Complexity. A Windows server out of the box is an elaborate system. Although it performs specific tasks well (such as being a web server) there are many services that have a complex set of dependencies, and it is never clear which ones are necessary and which can be removed to improve the system?s efficiency.""[Sempre riferito a Windows] Obscurity. Some parameters that control the system?s operation are hidden and difficult to fully assess. The metabase is an obvious example. The problem here is that is makes the administrator nervous; in a single-function system he wants to be able to understand all of the configuration-related choices that the system is making on his behalf.""Resource utilization. It?s true that Windows requires a more powerful computer than Linux or FreeBSD. In practice, this is a less important constraint. When you are building a large operation, you will use smaller numbers of relatively powerful systems. The PC systems in use at Hotmail are perfectly capable of running Windows, and the machine?s basic power is the same whether it is run with UNIX or Windows. For most of the time, it is only executing application code and most of the extra elaboration is not apparent."Fonte ? Microsoft....http://www.securityoffice.net/mssecrets/hotmail.html#_Toc491601819

Re: ma quale solaris avete provato .net
ma tu lo hai provato .net prima di balzare sulle baricate *nix,
non credo e potente sicuro se poi a te piace gestire un server
via console (cliccare e troppo naife) con .net (ma anche con
2000) hai potenti comandima tu ce l'hai la licenza elementare?